Critical Thinking

Section 2

Critical thinking isn’t about repeating what others believe—it’s about proving ideas to yourself. It means forming your own opinions based on facts, evidence, and reasoning rather than adopting or inheriting viewpoints from others. It also requires the flexibility to question your current thinking and accept that you may not have the full picture. The eight habits that follow offer a practical way to build this kind of thinking for real life and the workplace.

Eight Habits of Strong Critical Thinkers

Strong critical thinkers rely on a set of habits when they process information, solve problems, and make decisions.

Eight Habits of Strong Critical Thinkers

Strong critical thinkers rely on a set of habits when they process information, solve problems, and make decisions.

  1. Get It Right, Not Just Be Right

Strong critical thinkers don’t need to be right all the time. They’re smarter than that. They set aside ego and don’t feel the need to have all the answers. They are comfortable admitting when they don’t know something or when they’ve made a mistake. They ask questions and actively seek the best available information. Is this true of you?

2. Think Before Judging

They take time to understand a situation before reacting. They gather information, especially when decisions have serious consequences, and recognize that some choices deserve more careful thought than others. There are no bonus points for making a decision quickly. Take your time.

3. Question Information—Don’t Just Accept It

They look beyond the surface of the data. They check whether information is accurate, consider how it’s being presented, and ask what might be missing. They understand that information can reflect bias or support a particular agenda. What do different sources or experts say? If they don’t all agree, why? What has your own research—beyond these differing viewpoints—shown you to be true?

Exercising Mental Flexibility 

This is a simple exercise to help you practice critical thinking.

Choose a topic or situation.

  1. Write down two opposing views or different options.

  2. Work on your own to find reasons for and against both viewpoints or options.

  3. Compare your findings with others who completed the same exercise.

Then reflect:
Were you able to find research that supports both sides or options? Did you find concrete, verifiable facts? Did any of your findings challenge opinions you originally held? Did you put as much effort into finding facts for opposing viewpoints as you did for your own?

4. Balance Analysis with Action

They look for patterns and clarity without rushing to conclusions. By patiently considering both the big picture and the details, they learn when they have enough information to move forward—even if they don’t yet have every answer.

This means -

Suspending Judgment: Critical thinkers don’t rush to conclusions and adjust their thinking when new information emerges.

In the workplace it applies-

As noted in Simplified Strategic Planning, forcing a conclusion too early is a common mistake. Strong strategies often emerge by waiting for more data and allowing patterns in the market to become clear.

Metacognitive Exercise

This week, choose an opinion you hold—or a decision you need to make—and intentionally slow down your thinking. Use the three steps above to move beyond your usual default response and more carefully analyze the situation, the facts, the motives involved, and the underlying purpose.

You might try this during a conversation with someone who disagrees with an opinion you hold strongly. Ask yourself:

  • What facts are involved? Are they verifiable?

  • Are there credible facts supporting more than one viewpoint?

  • Can you research the topic further?

  • Can you, even briefly, try to see the issue from the opposing perspective?

The goal isn’t to change your opinion—it’s to practice thinking more deliberately before responding or deciding.

Thought of the Day

"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it."

— Aristotle

End Section 1